Meeting Notes

Paul Weismantel Paul Weismantel

The Ethics of Quality Care and Financial Resources

The discussion explored the tensions comparing the private equity, for-profit, and non-profit Business models of providing health care. Can a healthcare system with financial return obligations truly prioritize patients over profits?

Read More
Paul Weismantel Paul Weismantel

Reparations

Reparations for the Gullah represent redress for the injustices of slavery, the broken promises or reformation, and the continued disadvantages of lost inheritance that meant land cannot be used as an asset. Often, land developers have paid Gullah families less than their jointly held property was worth simply because the Gullahs lacked real choices. (Image: Oak Alley, McLeod Plantation, James Island, Charleston, SC, Creative Commons License.)

Read More
Paul Weismantel Paul Weismantel

The Wrongs of Human Suffering in Wartime

War is hell, as Michael Walzer says. The war convention licenses soldiers killing enemy soldiers. But one sordid aspect of it is the suffering it creates, not only among combatants but also among civilians, who suffer the “double effect” modern war invariably creates because so much of it relies on long-range firepower.

Read More
Paul Weismantel Paul Weismantel

The Ethics of the Just War Theory

Just War Theory, despite the paradox of its name, provides a means for examining wars on the grounds of principle instead of strategy  alone.

Read More
Paul Weismantel Paul Weismantel

The Electoral College vs. The Popular Vote

Five times in national history the Electoral College has sent presidents who did not win the popular vote to The White House: 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000 and 2016. Although polls show that 58 percent of U.S. adults favor amending the Constitution so that the popular vote would replace the Electoral College system, the party in power is not likely to promote such an upheaval.

Read More
Paul Weismantel Paul Weismantel

The Ethics of the Supreme Court

In response to criticisms of certain rulings, perceived as linked to the behavior of certain justices, the Supreme Court adopted a “code of conduct” consisting of aspirational rules in November 2023. Gordon Haist and Paul Weismantel argued the pros and cons of adopting such a code of conduct.

Read More

Archives